Our view on the ‘Non Paper 3.0’

Article

November 7, 2024

We welcome and support the efforts of the INC Chair to facilitate further discussions amongst governments following the publication of the 3rd iteration of his ‘Non Paper’. We also agree on the need to focus the ongoing efforts of INC members to align on the core elements that must be agreed upon at INC-5, identify priorities to be developed in the interim period and ensure that the treaty is effective, implementable, and fit for the purpose of addressing plastic pollution at a global scale.

However, at INC-5 government delegations need to significantly strengthen the draft treaty text proposed in the ‘Non Paper 3.0’. In its current form, it does not create the enabling conditions for UN Member States to implement an ambitious, effective and binding policy framework based on global rules that we have been calling for.

Based on our roadmap towards an effective Global Plastics Treaty, we call on INC members to complement and improve the draft articles setting out the core obligations for all countries and the additional steps to enable their effective implementation. In line with the rationale presented in the Chair’s ‘Non Paper’, and with our previous calls, we reiterate the need for governments to: 

  1. Agree on an ambitious starting point in the treaty text to address plastic pollution, including through core provisions to restrict or phase out problematic & avoidable plastic products as well as chemicals of concern, and to improve product design and extended producer responsibility (EPR) - to be defined through a common global approach.
  2. Commit to put the right structures in place to work on immediate priorities in the interim period between the Diplomatic Conference and first Conference of the Parties.
  3. Align on the  arrangements needed to provide capacity building, financial and technological support under the treaty.
  4. Provide a strong mandate for the governing body to further strengthen and improve targets and measures to be implemented under the treaty over time.

We, a group of 260+ global businesses, financial institutions and NGOs across the plastics value chain, stand ready to work together with policymakers across the world in the lead-up to and during the last planned round of negotiations on a Global Plastics Treaty (INC-5) in Busan later this month. There is no time to waste on this critical task. 

For our specific comments on the key elements of the ‘Non Paper 3.0’, see here.

The stages

Setting out

The draft treaty text includes a (sub-)section related to this focus area, but the proposed provisions do not reflect our recommendations.

Base camp

The draft treaty text proposes provisions that are at least partly aligned with our recommendations, but some major changes still need to be incorporated and/ or it lacks the necessary references to develop technical specifications to make them meaningful, operational and enforceable.

Starting the climb

The draft treaty text proposes provisions that are mostly aligned to our recommendations, and it references the need to develop technical specifications to ensure harmonised implementation.

Almost there

The draft treaty text proposes provisions that are aligned to our recommendations, and it requires technical specifications to be adopted by the INC or the future governing body to help governments to implement harmonised and effective regulations.

Summit

The draft treaty text contains both the legal provisions and the technical specifications needed to help governments to implement harmonised and effective regulations in line with our recommendations.

Starting the climb

Chemicals and polymers of concern

Starting the climb

Problematic and avoidable plastic products

Base camp

Reduce, Reuse, Refill and repair of plastics and plastic products

Base camp

Product design and performance

Starting the climb

Extended Producer Responsibility

Starting the climb

Waste management

Photo of Ellen
Starting the journey

The draft treaty text includes a (sub-)section related to this focus area, but the proposed provisions do not reflect the Business Coalition’s recommendations.

Photo of Ellen
Base camp

The draft treaty text proposes provisions that are at least partly aligned with the Business Coalition recommendations, but some major changes still need to be incorporated and/ or it lacks the necessary references to develop technical specifications to make them meaningful, operational and enforceable.

Photo of Ellen
Starting the climb

The draft treaty text proposes provisions that are mostly aligned to the Business Coalition’s recommendations, and it references the need to develop technical specifications to ensure harmonised implementation. 

Photo of Ellen
Almost there

The draft treaty text proposes provisions that are aligned to the Business Coalition’s recommendations, and it requires technical specifications to be adopted by the INC or the future governing body to help governments to implement harmonised and effective regulations.

Photo of Ellen
Summit

The draft treaty text contains both the legal provisions and the technical specifications needed to help governments to implement harmonised and effective regulations in line with the Business Coalition’s recommendations.